Judge rejects challenge to Florida’s ‘vaccine passport’ ban

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – A Leon County circuit justice has refused to artifact a authorities instrumentality that bans alleged “vaccine passports,” rejecting arguments by a Sarasota concern that the instrumentality violates First Amendment rights.

The ruling by Circuit Judge Layne Smith was a triumph for Gov. Ron DeSantis, who has led efforts to forestall businesses from requiring customers to amusement impervious they are vaccinated against COVID-19 --- an contented that has go known arsenic requiring vaccine passports.

Smith besides divided from a South Florida national judge, who sided successful August with Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings successful a situation to the authorities law. In some cases, the plaintiffs argued that the instrumentality was an unconstitutional regularisation connected speech.

But Smith, successful a six-page determination Thursday, rejected the First Amendment arguments of Bead Abode, a Sarasota hobby and trade store, and refused to contented an injunction against the law. Smith said the basal contented successful the lawsuit is whether the instrumentality restricts code oregon regulates conduct.

Ad

“The lone contented earlier the court, and the lone 1 the tribunal decided, is whether (the law) abridges Bead Abode’s First Amendment close to state of speech,” Smith wrote. “It does not. Instead, the statute regulates the plaintiff’s conduct.”

Smith, who was appointed arsenic a circuit justice by DeSantis aft serving arsenic a region judge, besides pointed to the Legislature’s authorization and said the instrumentality “assures unfastened markets.”

“Prohibiting businesses from requiring patrons to nutrient documentary impervious of vaccination oregon betterment whitethorn oregon whitethorn not beryllium a bully idea,” helium wrote. “Notwithstanding, that determination belongs solely to the Legislature and is taxable to support oregon rejection by the voters astatine the ballot box.”

The Republican-dominated Legislature passed the instrumentality successful April, with the authorities threatening fines against businesses that interruption it. Bead Abode has closed its doors since aboriginal successful the pandemic, though it sells products online and offers online classes.

Ad

Bead Abode developed a program to reopen but wanted to necessitate customers --- galore of whom are seniors --- to amusement impervious of vaccination to assistance forestall the dispersed of the virus.

“Absent the alleviation being sought to enjoin suspect (the state) from enforcement of this intelligibly unconstitutional content-based regularisation connected protected speech, Bead Abode would beryllium forced to take betwixt its committedness to the information of its customers and crushing penalties from enforcement of this law,” lawyer Andrew Boyer, whose wife, Kirsten, owns the store, wrote successful the lawsuit.

In the ruling, Smith wrote that helium has “great respect” for U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams, who sided with Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings successful the national lawsuit, but added “this tribunal indispensable reappraisal the instrumentality and marque its ain decision.”

Williams’ August determination applied lone to Norwegian. In it, she wrote that the instrumentality is simply a “content-based restriction” connected speech, arsenic it targets documentation but allows businesses to petition different accusation from customers astir issues specified arsenic vaccinations.

Ad

“While companies cannot necessitate customers to verify their vaccination presumption with ‘documentation,’ the statute does not prohibit businesses from verifying vaccination presumption successful different ways (e.g., orally),” wrote Williams, who was nominated to the seat by erstwhile President Barack Obama. “Accordingly, nether (the law), businesses could inactive ‘discriminate’ against unvaccinated individuals by adopting a vaccination requirement, which they could enforce by requiring oral verification of vaccination presumption earlier introduction oregon by deterring unvaccinated patrons from entering by putting up signs that work ‘vaccinated customers only’ and ‘unvaccinated patrons are not allowed.’”

The authorities has appealed Williams’ determination to the Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Copyright 2021 by WJXT News4Jax - All rights reserved.